检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:童成寿[1]
机构地区:[1]福建对外经济贸易职业技术学院,福建福州350016
出 处:《四川教育学院学报》2009年第11期33-36,共4页Journal of Sichuan College of Education
摘 要:目的:编制《熟手型英语教师素质测评问卷》,检验其信度与效度,为今后的实证研究提供可靠的工具。方法:从《熟手型英语教师素质编码词典》和访谈研究的原始文本中选择测验项目,制定出包含59道题目的原始问卷,然后采用探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析。结果:问卷包含31个项目,六个维度,分别是关系技巧、专业素质、专业偏好、专业提升、积极关注、自我调适。因素分析结果表明,六个维度可解释总方差的67.826%,各维度的项目负荷在0.420~0.772之间。分量表的同质信度在0.7402~0.9370之间。验证性因素分析显示CFI,GFI,RNSEA值分别为0.928,0.873,0.056。结论:编制的《熟手型英语教师素质测评问卷》具有理想的信度、效度,可在今后的研究实践中使用。Objective: To develop "the Test of the Quality of Proficient Teachers of English" , examine its reliability and validity, and provide instrument for the further study. Methods : 59 items were chosen from " Competency ceding dictionary of Proficient Teachers of English" and scripts of interview research. Then the exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was applied to the data. Results: "The Test of the Quality of Proficient Teachers of English" consisted of 31 items and six subseales which are relationship skills, professional quality, professional preference, professional upgrade, active attention, self- adjustment. Factor analysis indicated that the six factors explain 67. 826% of the variance with loading between 0. 420 - 0. 772. The six subseales had internal consistencies with Cronbach's 0. 7402 - 0. 9370. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that CFI, GFI, RMSEA were 0.928,0. 873,0. 056 respectively. Conclusion: "The Test of the Quality of Proficient Teachers of English" has satisfying validities and reliabilities, which can be applied in the future research.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28