检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戎幸[1] 孙炳海[1,2] 黄小忠[3] 蔡旻颖[1] 李伟健[2]
机构地区:[1]浙江师范大学心理研究所,浙江金华321004 [2]北京师范大学发展心理研究所,北京100875 [3]浙江大学心理系
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2010年第2期158-160,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:教育部人文社科研究项目(09YJAXLX024);2009年浙江省教育科学规划课题(SCG2)的部分研究成果;浙江省高校优秀青年教师资助计划资助
摘 要:目的:翻译并修订人际反应指数量表(IRI),考察其信度和效度。方法:对419名大学生和62名犯人进行调查。结果:验证性因素分析表明,C-IRI四因素结构拟合较好,各分量表的建构信度在0.59~0.75之间,重测信度在0.59~0.78之间。各分量表与效标量表的相关分析结果表明C-IRI具有良好的效标关联效度,犯人被试的C-IRI量表得分显著低于对照组中大学生被试的量表得分(t=-2.59,P<0.05)。结论:C-IRI具有良好的信度和效度,可以用于测量成人的共情水平。Objective:To revise the Interpersonal Reactivity Index(IRI) and to examine its reliability and validity.Methods:Data were collected from a sample of 419 college students and 62 offenders and analyzed by reliability test and validity test.Results:The results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed that the revised IRI was four-factor construct and had good construct validities.The construct reliability of the subscales ranged from 0.59 ~0.75,and test -retest reliability of the subscales ranged from 0.59~0.78.Revised IRI also had good criterion-related validity and discrimination validity.The scores of offenders were significantly lower than those of the controlled group(t=-2.59,P〈0.05).Conclusion:With acceptable psychometric quality,the Chinese version of Interpersonal Reactivity Index could be used to assess the empathy of Chinese college students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229