检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩燕红[1] 何平先[1] 徐兰兰[1] 肖娟[1] 孙莉[1]
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志》2010年第8期15-17,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
基 金:湖北省教育科学“十一五”规划基金项目(2008B290)
摘 要:目的 探讨护理学基础实验课中实验设计的效果.方法 将168名和199名护理本科生分别作为对照组和实验组.在〈护理学基础〉实验课教学中,对照组采用传统实验教学法,实验组护生课前必须预习并完成实验设计.比较2组的教学效果.结果 实验组护生操作成绩明显高于对照组;更大比例的实验组护生反映新教学法利于提高创新能力、解决问题能力及动手能力;100%带教老师反映结合了实验设计的教学法提高了护生操作水平、强化了理论知识、活跃了课堂气氛.结论 实验设计能充分调动护生学习积极性和主动性,促使其多动脑、勤思考、敢提问.Objective To explore the effect of experimental design in the experimental teaching of fundamental nursing. Methods 168 and 199 baccalaureate nursing students were in the control and experimental group respectively, the control group received traditional experimental teaching method, and the experimental group must complete the experimental design before entering the lab. The teaching effect between the two groups were compared. Results The mean operation score of the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group, the proportion of those students who reflected their teaching method could enhance creative ability, problem-solving ability and practical ability was higher in the experimental group, 100% teachers reflected experimental design could improve operation level, strengthen theoretical knowledge, animate teaching atmosphere. Conclusions Experimental design could arouse students' enthusiasm and initiative to study, advocate them to think and ask.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学] R47-4[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117