检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国公共卫生管理》2010年第4期443-444,共2页Chinese Journal of Public Health Management
摘 要:目的为探讨纸片法检测大肠菌群结果判断标准的精确性。方法按GB14934-94判断标准,分别对纸片法和发酵法两种方法的监测结果进行比较,其中591份餐具采用发酵法,955份餐具采用纸片法。结果结纸片法和发酵法二法有显著性差异(P<0.005)。结论在实际工作中当纸片法结果可疑时,应采用发酵法进行培养后,再作出结果判定,以保证食具消毒效果检测结果的准确性。Objective To investigate the accuracy of the test results of coliforms by Paper Strip Method.Methods The two methods,fermentation method and Paper Strip method,were used respectively.Results 591 samples of tableware were detected by fermentation method,and 955 tableware were detected by paper strip method.The test results showed that there were significant statistical differences between the two methods.Conclusions When the test re-sults by Paper Strip Method was questionable,we should adopt fermentation method for further test before making judgment for ensuring to provide reliable results of tableware.
分 类 号:R115[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.117.5