《护理美学》教学对护生评判性思维能力的影响调查  

Investigation on influence of "Nursing aesthetics" teaching on critical thinking ability of nursing students

作　　者：井晓磊[1] 白玲[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南中医学院第一附属医院

出　　处：《全科护理》2010年第35期3277-3278,共2页Chinese General Practice Nursing

摘　　要：[目的]探讨在《护理美学》课程中应用多种教学方法对护生评判性思维能力的影响。[方法]将护理本科生按班级分为对照组和实验组,对照组进行以讲授法为主的传统教学法,实验组进行多种现代护理教学法,采用彭美慈等研制的评判性思维测量表(CTDI-CV)在课程前、课程后对所有护生进行测评。[结果]课程实施后实验组在评判性思维能力总分及寻找真相、系统化能力、批判思维自信心、求知欲、认知成熟度的维度得分上均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组课程实施前后比较,除开放思想维度外,实施后总分及其他维度得分均高于实施前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]《护理美学》教学中应用多种教学方法能有效促进护生评判性思维能力的提高。Objective：To probe into the influence of a variety of teaching methods applied in ＂Nursing aesthetic＂ course on critical thinking ability of nursing students.Methods：Nursing undergraduates were divided into control and test group according to their class numbers.Nursing students in control group were taken the traditional lecturing method as a teaching method.Nursing students in test group were carried out a variety of modern nursing teaching methods.Then all nursing students were assessed by adopting Peng Meici designed CTDI-CV before and after the course.Results：After the course implementation,the critical thinking ability total score and scores in dimensions of finding out the truth,systematic ability,critical thinking self-confidence,curiosity,cognitive maturity of test group students were higher than that of control group students.There were statistical significant differences between them（P0.05）.In test group,except open-thinking,the total score and other dimension scores after curriculum implementation of them were higher than that of before the implementation.There were statistical significant differences between them（P0.05）.Conclusion：To apply a variety of teaching methods in ＂Nursing aesthetic＂ course can effectively promote critical thinking ability of nursing students.

关 键 词：护理美学 评判性思维 护生 

分 类 号：R-4[医药卫生]