高职护生评判性思维能力的培养  

Cultivation of critical thinking ability of high vocational nursing students

作　　者：吴世芬[1] 刘海燕[1] 张鹤琼[1] 徐雅玲[1] 凌银婵[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西医科大学护理学院

出　　处：《全科护理》2011年第7期569-571,共3页Chinese General Practice Nursing

基　　金：广西医科大学社会科学研究课题立项项目;编号:校社科2009B16

摘　　要：[目的]探讨《护理学基础》实训教学中应用多种教学方法对高职护生评判性思维能力的影响。[方法]将169名高职护生随机分为两组,对照组83人,观察组86人,对照组采用传统的实践教学方法,观察组采用以问题为基础的学习(PBL)教学法、小组讨论、反思学习、社会实践等多种实践教学方法。应用中文版评判性思维能力测量表(CTDI-CV)对护生进行评判性思维能力评定。[结果]两组护生实训后CTDI-CV得分均高于实训前(P均<0.05);观察组护生实训后CTDI-CV总分及寻求真相、评判性思维自信心、求知欲、认知成熟度4个特质分均高于对照组(P均<0.05)。[结论]《护理学基础》实训教学中应用多种教学方法可提高护生的评判性思维能力。Objective：To probe into the influence of applying variety of teaching methods on critical thinking ability of high vocational nursing students in practical teaching of ＂Fundmental Nursing＂.Methods：A total of 169 nursing students were randomly divided into control group（n=83） and test group（n=86）.Students in control group were adopted the traditional way of practical teaching.However,students in test group were adopted variety of teaching methods including PBL method,group discussion,reflective learning and social practice,etc.Then all nursing students were evaluated on critical thinking ability by CTDI-CV.Results：CTDI-CV scores of both group students after practical teaching were higher than that before practical teaching（both P0.05）.Total CTDI-CV score and scores of four characteristics points（including searching for the truth,critical thinking self-confidence,knowledge-seeking desire and cognitive maturity） of nursing students in test group were all higher than that of control group students（all P0.05）.Conclusion：Applying variety of teaching methods in practical teaching of ＂Fundmental Nursing＂can enhance critical thinking ability of nursing students.

关 键 词：评判性思维能力 高职护生 实训教学 

分 类 号：R-4[医药卫生]