检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周萌[1] 韦凯[2] 周顺华[1] 肖军华[1] 宫全美[1]
机构地区:[1]同济大学交通运输工程学院,上海201804 [2]西南交通大学牵引动力国家重点实验室,四川成都610031
出 处:《中国铁道科学》2011年第2期33-40,共8页China Railway Science
基 金:上海市"科技创新行动计划"重点科技项目(09231201600);上海市博士后科研基金资助项目(10R21416300)
摘 要:以上海某地铁站与建筑物共建工程为例,现场实测由于地铁运行引起的车站站厅层、上部结构各楼层的动力响应,建立道床—共建结构—地基二维动力有限元模型。通过对比分析计算和实测的共建结构竖向振动加速度的时域谱和1/3倍频程振级谱,探讨普通轨道、科隆蛋高弹扣件轨道和钢弹簧浮置板轨道在引起共建结构振动响应方面的差异。研究结果表明:采用科隆蛋高弹扣件轨道时,共建结构同一位置的加速度峰值约是普通轨道的1/2,而固有频率为6 Hz的钢弹簧浮置板轨道的加速度峰值仅为普通轨道的1/10左右,但钢弹簧浮置板轨道引起的振动周期和持时相对较长;科隆蛋高弹扣件轨道与钢弹簧浮置板轨道均有明显的减振效果,所不同的是前者对25 Hz以下、后者对25 Hz以上频段的竖向振动有较好减振效果;钢弹簧浮置板固有频率的变化对该共建结构振动响应的影响很小。Based on a project in Shanghai that a subway station and building were jointly constructed, the dynamic response of the station hall and the upper floors of the structure by metro operation was field measured. The two-dimensional dynamic finite element model of railway track bed-jointly built structure-foundation was established. Through comparatively analyzing the calculated and the field tested time-domain spectrum and 1/3 octave spectrum of the vertical vibration acceleration of the jointly-built structure, the differences of the vibration response in the jointly-built structure aroused by the general track, Cologne-egg high-elastic fastener track and steel-spring floating slab track were investigated. The main conclusions show that the peak acceleration amplitude of the jointly-built structure is about half of that of the general track at the same position when adopting Cologne-eggs high-elastic fastener. The peak acceleration amplitude of steel-spring floating slab track whose natural frequency is 6 Hz is only about 1/10 of that of the general track at the same position. However, as for the cycle and the duration of the vertical vibration, steel-spring floating slab track is relatively longer. The vibration-reduction effect of both Cologne-egg high-elastic fastener track and steel-spring floating slab track is obvious. The difference is that the former (the latter) is provided with better vertical vibration-reduction effect on the vibration of the frequency band below 25 Hz (above 25 Hz). The change of the natural frequency of steel-spring floating slab track has little effect on vibration response with regard to this jointly-built project.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117