论“人格同一性”——洛克、莱布尼兹、休谟的解释与争论  

The Personal Identity:Interpretations and Disputations among Locke,Leibniz and Hume

作　　者：张桂权[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川师范大学政治教育学院,四川成都610068

出　　处：《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第3期93-100,共8页Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition

摘　　要：人格同一性(自我等同、自我同一性)问题是当代哲学的重要问题之一,而这一问题产生于近代哲学,尤其是洛克哲学。洛克是为了反对笛卡尔把"自我"或"人格"等同于精神实体才提出"人格"及其同一性问题的。洛克的"人格"概念直接导致了康德的"先验自我",间接影响了现象学的产生;而洛克关于人格的"记忆标准"尽管遭到众多批评但仍然是目前最好的标准。Locke was the first philosopher to put forth and expound the concept of ＇the personal identity＇.Soon afterwards,Leibniz and Hume criticized Locke＇s viewpoints and offered different interpretations.Today,the personal identity is still one of important subjects in psychology and philosophy.In this paper,the author explores Locke＇s,Leibniz＇s and Hume＇s notions of the personal identity respectively and the disputations among them,and makes two comments on this subject.

关 键 词：人格同一性 洛克 莱布尼兹 休谟 

分 类 号：B561.24[哲学宗教—外国哲学]