试析中西方心理学体系结合的方法问题——兼论“中国心理学史”研究的困境与改革  

Methodological Issues in the Integration of Chinese Psychology and Western Psychology:Difficulties and Innovations in the Studies on the History of Chinese Psychology

作　　者：郭斯萍[1] 陈四光[2] 

机构地区：[1]广州大学教育学院 [2]扬州大学教育科学学院

出　　处：《南京师大学报（社会科学版）》2011年第4期94-100,共7页Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：广东省哲学社会科学规划项目(GD10CXL05);江苏省社科基金项目(10JYC015)

摘　　要：近30年前出版的中国心理学史教材,舍人文主义而取科学主义的心理学研究范式,形成了两种研究模式。一种以科学主义心理学的概念体系作为挖掘与整合的主要框架,使得中国古代心理学史的研究停留在外在逻辑水平。另一种是潘菽教授言传身行的科学性原则。潘菽避开了科学主义心理学的研究困境,认为中国古代心理学思想是否具有科学性,应该检验其是否合乎人的心理实际,是否有助于破解当代心理学的问题与提高心理学的科学性。中国心理学史的改革必须坚持潘菽教授的科学性原则,以开放的学科视角,兼容科学与人文范式,并蓄各种研究方法,才能发展出体现中国文化内在逻辑原则的心理学体系。In making the historical account of Chinese psychology in the textbook published nearly three decades ago,the compilers adopted the scientific paradigm at the expense of the humanistic paradigm,giving rise to two ways of making historical studies on the development of Chinese psychology.One is to use the theoretical system of scientific psychology as the major framework to make historical investigations,thus excluding the ancient Chinese psychological studies from the logical studies on psychology;the other is the way advocated by Professor Pan Shu,who saw through the difficulties of the scientific paradigm of psychological studies by arguing that the criteria for judging the contribution of ancient Chinese psychology should depend on whether it is in line with the facts of human psychological activities and whether it can help solve the problems we are facing today and thus enhance the scientific studies on human psychology.The innovations in the studies on the history of Chinese psychology should stick to the principle advanced by Professor Pan.Only when we combine the advantages of humanistic and scientific paradigms can we establish a theoretical system of psychology characterized by the inner logic of Chinese culture.

关 键 词：中国心理学史 科学性原则 心理学体系 

分 类 号：B84-09[哲学宗教—基础心理学]