《申报》与“《苏报》案”  

Shenbao and the Case of SuBao

作　　者：李建刚[1] 黄艳峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖北师范学院历史文化学院,湖北黄石435002

出　　处：《湖北师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2011年第5期15-18,共4页Journal of Hubei Normal University（Philosophy and Social Science）

摘　　要：《苏报》因宣传革命而触怒清政府,遭至封杀,撰稿人被捕,是为"《苏报》案"。作为"中国近现代史百科全书"的《申报》对此案进行了全程报道,但它在字里行间与行文的语气上有隔岸观火与落井下石之嫌,表现出了与它作为报界领袖极不相称的立场,在报界同仁遭遇不幸的时候不仅没有表示同情、施以援手,反倒充当了满清政府的应声虫。作为一个幸灾乐祸的看客,它在貌似公正的报道下,让读者看到了清政府勾结洋人戕害革命者的丑恶行径,也真切地感受到外国侵略者对我国司法的粗暴干涉,从而激起了更多的仁人志士走上革命道路,这种结局是《申报》始料未及的。SuBao was blocked and the editors were arrested by the Qing Dynasty government because of the propaganda revolution, it is the ease of SuBao. As ＂China modern history encyclopedia＂, ShenBao reported the entire Case. It was suspicion that ShcnBao took as a bystander and even attacked SuBao in the case through reading between the lines in its articles and the tone of its reported. In the press eoUeagues encountering the mffortunate, ShenBao not only didnt express the sympathy but also acted the Qing Dynasty government＇s yes - man which showed it was unfit for the leader of the press. As a gloating spectator, ShenBao reported the case at the seemingly fair standpoint which let the renders knew that the Qing Dynasty government had colluded with the foreign invaders to destroy the Chinese revolution and truly felt that the foreign invaders interfered in Chinese judicature publicly. So it aroused more people to step onto the revolutionary path, this Consequence were unexpected.

关 键 词：辛亥革命 《申报》 《苏报》案 章炳麟 邹容 

分 类 号：K257.1[历史地理—历史学]