检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡平[1]
机构地区:[1]教育部考试中心
出 处:《中国考试》2012年第3期51-54,共4页journal of China Examinations
摘 要:我国古代有关评价的实践活动多集中表现在对人才的评定和选拔上,并且一直重视两方面的评价功能,一是对人的才智的评价,二是对人的德行的评价。而人才选拔才智的评价主要是靠考试来获取信息,这就涉及对评价标准的认识和如何将这些认识的标准运用于具体的评价手段上,科举制解决了由主观认识带来的一系列问题,并且在实践中积累了一套评价标准比较客观、评价形式相对规范的"文有定评"的方法,值得我们深入研究和借鉴。至于德行评价的内容,还有待挖掘。The evaluation and selection of qualified personnel are the concentration expression of the evaluation activities In ancient China, two important function of evaluation has been emphasized, one is the evaluation of intelligence, the other is the evaluation of morality. The information on the selection of one' s intelligence is mainly depended on examination, which requires the recognition of evaluation standard and the utilization of the standard in particular methods, the generation of the imperial examination system gradually solved the problem brought by subjective cognition, in particular, the relatively objective, normative methodology accumulated in the long history of examination practice, which requires deep research and reference, in regards for the evaluation of morality, it remains to be determined.
分 类 号:G405[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117