台湾地区大学生救济权利的最新突破:第684号大法官解释评析  

Breakthrough in the Cause of Action of College Students in Taiwan:An Analysis of Interpretation 684 of the Grand Justices Council

作　　者：张冉[1] 申素平[2] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学教育学院,北京100871 [2]中国人民大学教育学院,北京100872

出　　处：《复旦教育论坛》2012年第2期55-60,共6页Fudan Education Forum

基　　金：中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)"高等教育法制的国际比较与最新发展"(10XNJ029)

摘　　要：2011年1月,我国台湾地区"司法院大法官会议"作出第684号解释,部分变更了之前的第382号解释,大幅拓展了大学生的救济权利。该项解释挑战了教育法学中的基础关系与经营关系二分理论,标志着特别权力关系理论在台湾高校与学生关系领域的进一步消亡。第684号解释对台湾地区的教育法学理论、司法实务和高校管理已经并将持续产生重要影响。中国大陆有必要密切关注并对其作深入分析,从而为完善现有的高校学生司法救济制度提供借鉴。In January 2011, the Grand Justices Council in the Judicial Yuan of Taiwan, China, issued Interpretation 684, which partially replaces Interpretation 382 and expands the cause of action for college students. This new interpretation undermines the distinction between fundamental relationship and management relationship, a legal standard previously used in education law research. With Interpretation 684, the special authority relation theory can hardly explain university-student relationship. This new interpretation has already had and will continue to have profound impact on education law theory, judicial practice and higher education administration in Taiwan. Scholars and policy makers in China's Mainland should closely follow and carefully analyze these changes so as to improve the judicial remedy system available for university students in Mainland.

关 键 词：救济权利 处分 特别权力关系理论 基本权利 台湾地区 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]