检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华东师范大学学前与特教学院,上海200062 [2]言语听觉科学教育部重点实验室,上海200062 [3]上海市黄浦区文庙路幼儿园,上海200010
出 处:《学术探索》2012年第4期174-177,共4页Academic Exploration
摘 要:以48名阅读优生和阅读学困生为被试(24名阅读优生,24名阅读学困生),采用2×2×2三因素混合实验设计,考察了附加问题的不同类型(意义性附加问题和监控性附加问题)和不同位置(附加问题的前置和后置)对阅读学困生和阅读优生说明文阅读理解的影响。结果表明(1)附加问题在说明文阅读理解上存在显著影响,对阅读学困生的影响要强于阅读优生;(2)意义性附加问题对阅读学困生说明文阅读理解的效果要强于监控性;(3)附加问题的后置效果要好于前置。Abstract :With 48 experimenters (24 efficient readers and 24 inefficient readers), the effects of adjunct questions with differ- ent types ( meaning - adjunct - questions and monitoring - adjunct - questions ) and positions ( preposition and postposition of adjunct questions) on the exposition reading comprehension of both efficient readers and inefficient readers were examined by a 2 × 2 × 2 mixed experimental design. The results showed that : ( 1 ) adjunct questions had great effect on exposition reading com- prehension and this kind of influence was stronger on inefficient readers than on efficient readers. (2) Meaning - adjunct - ques- tion had more facilitative effects on inefficient readers than on monitoring -adjunct -questions. (3) There was better effect when adjunct question was postpositioned than it was prepositioned.
分 类 号:G420[文化科学—课程与教学论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145