检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国地质大学马克思主义学院,湖北武汉430074
出 处:《中国地质大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年第2期125-130,140,共6页Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目"当代德国政治教育理论及其批判借鉴研究"(10BKS054);国家社科基金青年项目"战后德国政治文化变迁背景下的联邦政治教育中心研究及启示"(11CKS025)
摘 要:联邦德国建国之初,政治制度和政治文化经历着深刻转型,政治教育被赋予了特殊的历史使命。但是,20世纪50年代至70年代,联邦德国学术界及联邦政府政治教育机构对政治教育该如何适应并大力促进西方议会民主制国家的建立和民主政治文化发展的问题争论不休。本文从20世纪50年代的欧廷格与李特之争、60年代的政治教育大讨论、70年代的"解放"与"理性"之争,梳理了这场旷日持久的思想争论。这场关于政治教育思想的争论,实质上是德国学术界对当时德国政治文化和政治教育发展现状和趋势,以学术思想的方式所作的回应,在很大程度上推动了政治教育理论与实践的发展。In the early days when Federal Republic of Germany was founded,the political system and political culture had experienced a profound transformation,and the political education was given a special historical mission.However,from the 1950s to the 1970s,academics and even the federal government of the Federal Republic of Germany had controversy on how to adapt to and vigorously promote the establishment of Western parliamentary democracy and the development of democratic political culture by the political education.This paper reproduces the ideological controversy from the 1950s' Oetinger-Litt dispute and the 1960s' controversy about political education to the 1970s' dispute between 'liberation' and 'rationality'.This controversy on the political and educational thought was essentially the German academia's response by the way of academic thinking to the German political culture and political development of education status and trends,and,to large extent,promoted the development of political and educational theory and practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222