墨子“和”思想的内悖  

The Logical Contradiction of "He" in Mozi's Thought

作　　者：王艳[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽师范大学政法学院,安徽芜湖241002

出　　处：《合肥师范学院学报》2012年第2期46-49,共4页Journal of Hefei Normal University

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"我国古代和谐伦理思想研究"(2009JJD720021);教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目"道德教育中的悖论现象研究--道德教育有效性问题反思"(10YJC720045);国家级精品课程"马克思主义伦理学"建设项目(教高函〔2009〕21号);安徽省教育厅人文社科项目"中西道德教育悖论现象比较研究"(2009sk075)

摘　　要："和"是墨子思想的集中概括,也是墨子主张的终极诉求。以"兼爱"立论的道德教育是"非攻"致"和"的逻辑起点和实践路径,但无差别却脱离自爱的"兼爱"要求、诉诸外力而不反求诸己的"明鬼"观念、以利释义的"志功合一"理论所蕴含的内悖,决定了墨子"和"继缺"同"的思想只能是空想。＂He＂ is the centralized condensation and ultimate appeal in Mozi＇s thought.The moral education based on ＂universal impartial love＂ is the logical start and practical path from ＂non-attack＂ to ＂He＂.But his theory is internally paradoxical,such as the ＂universal impartial love＂ in which self-love is broken away,the ＂existence of the ghost＂ in which one resorts to external force but oneself,the ＂unity of motive and effect＂ in which righteousness is defined by interests.So Mozi＇s thought of ＂He＂ in which ＂identicalness＂ is absent is only a fantasy.

关 键 词：墨子 “和” “兼爱” 道德教育 内悖 

分 类 号：B224[哲学宗教—中国哲学]