检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南大学教育学部,重庆400715 [2]西南大学实验幼儿园(南区),重庆400715
出 处:《心理发展与教育》2012年第3期248-254,共7页Psychological Development and Education
摘 要:研究检验了时序记忆与心理理论的关系。实验一对39个3.5~5.5岁儿童的时序记忆能力以及心理理论表现进行测查,考察了因果关系、相关关系、无因果无相关关系三类不同性质的材料测得的时序记忆与心理理论的关系;90个儿童参与了实验二,通过正叙、倒叙、预叙三种叙述方式将时序记忆分离为理解性时序记忆和机械性时序记忆,再分别考察与心理理论的关系。结果发现,在不同性质的实验材料中,时序记忆与心理理论相关均不显著;5.5岁儿童的理解性时序记忆显著高于3.5岁儿童,4.5岁、5.5岁儿童的机械性时序记忆显著高于3.5岁儿童;只有理解性时序记忆能够预测儿童的心理理论成绩。The research examined the relationship between temporal order memory and theory of mind. In study 1, we examined the performance about temporal order memory and theory of mind of 39 children from 3.5 - 5.5 years old and the relationship between temporal order memory and theory of mind was measured by three different types of materials including causality correlation,and neither-nor texts; In study 2,90 children were involved in to examine the relationship between the two memory components which are comprehension memory and mechanical memory dissociated by depiction, flashback, and flashforward and theory of mind respectively. The result showed that in different materials, the relationship between temporal order memory and theory of mind wasn' t significant ;5.5-year- old children' s comprehension memory was significantly higher than the 3.5-year-old children' s ; 4.5-year-old and 5.5-year-old children' s mechanical memory was significantly higher than those of 3.5-year-old children' s ; Only comprehension memory can predict the performance of theory of mind.
分 类 号:B844.1[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117