检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南民族大学外语学院,武汉430074 [2]武汉生物工程学院外语系,武汉430415
出 处:《重庆理工大学学报(社会科学)》2012年第6期49-53,80,共6页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology(Social Science)
基 金:中南民族大学中央高校基本业务费资助项目(CSY11025);黑龙江大学青年科学基金项目"基于语料库的国务院政府工作报告体裁分析"(QW201129)的阶段性研究成果
摘 要:话语与权力紧密相连,权力是通过话语表现的。在作为机构话语的法庭话语中,庭审参与各方的话语权力形成了一个连续体,律师的话语权力位于法官和公诉人之后,但又远大于原被告和证人。为了展现不同类型案件中律师话语的权力控制情况,以9场庭审话语的转录语料为研究样本,从律师的问话与答语两个方面,描述了律师话语与权力控制的关系。Discourse and power are closely interlinked, and power is manifested through discourse. In the courtroom discourse, as a typical type of institutional talk, all the discourse power of participants of the trial forms a continuum. The power of the lawyer is less than that of the judge and the prosecu- tor, but far more than that of the plaintiff, the defendant and the witness. In order to demonstrate how power manipulates lawyers' discourse in different types of cases, based on the authentic record-tran- scriptions of the trails, this paper depicts the relationship between lawyers' discourse and the corre- sponding power manipulation, from the perspectives of lawyers' questions and responses.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.157