检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京工业大学生命科学与生物工程学院,北京100124
出 处:《食品工业科技》2012年第16期176-178,182,共4页Science and Technology of Food Industry
摘 要:应用电子顺磁共振(EPR)和紫外-可见分光光度计(UV-Vis)两种方法研究美国加州和中国广西柠檬汁清除DPPH自由基的能力。结果表明,EPR方法测得加州和广西柠檬汁的半数清除率EC50值分别为54.53%和32.73%;UV-Vis方法测得加州和广西柠檬汁的EC50值分别为46.41%和30.41%,并且DPPH自由基清除率与柠檬汁浓度呈现良好的正相关性。统计学分析结果表明,两种实验方法的实验结果之间无显著性差异,测试方法对实验结果无显著性影响,两种方法均可用于柠檬汁对DPPH自由基清除能力的研究。The DPPH radical scavenging capacities of California lemon juice and Guangxi lemon juice were determined using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis). The ECso values for California and Guangxi lemon juice measured by EPR method were 54.53% and 32.73%, respectively,and the corresponding vales measured by UV-Vis method were 46.41% and 30.41%, respectively. The study revealed good positive correlation between DPPH radical scavenging rate and lemon juice concentration. In addition,statistical analysis indicated that the results were not significantly influenced by methods. In conclusion,both the two methods could be used for analysis of DPPH radical scavenging capacities of lemon iuice.
关 键 词:电子顺磁共振 紫外可见分光光度计 柠檬汁 DPPH自由基
分 类 号:TS255.44[轻工技术与工程—农产品加工及贮藏工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.69