词汇刻意学习与伴随性学习的比较研究——以初级水平东南亚汉语学习者为例  

A Longitudinal Study of Intentional and Incidental Vocabulary Learning

作　　者：吴门吉[1] 陈令颖[2] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学国际汉语学院,广东广州510275 [2]中山大学中文系,广东广州510275

出　　处：《华文教学与研究》2012年第3期11-18,共8页TCSOL Studies

摘　　要：伴随性学习一直是词汇学习讨论的焦点问题之一。本文在Ebbinghaus的遗忘曲线和Pimsleur的记忆方案基础上,操作了一次历时近一个月的实验,对比研究了刻意学习法(背词表)和伴随性学习法的学习效果。结果发现:1)背词表组成绩普遍高于伴随性学习组,但难以掌握词义抽象的词语;2)伴随性学习组在开始阶段受到"伴随性"影响,容易忽略目标词,学习成绩较差。但有机会掌握词义抽象的词语,在词汇输出上更有创造性,学习积极性高。The incidental learning has been one of the focus of vocabulary studies. Referring to the Ebbinghaus Forgetting Curve and the memory schedule by Pimsleur, this paper conducted an experiment lasting nearly one month, to contrast the different effects between intentional learning （word list） and incidental learning （reading plus dictionary） . The results show that ： （ 1 ） The score of intentional learning group was much higher than the incidental learning group. But intentional learning group could not fully master vocabularies with complicated and abstract meanings; （2） Because of ＂being inci- dental＂, incidental learning group tended to ignore the target words, so the score was low at the beginning. But incidental learning, as a progressive learning process, showed its advantages gradually. This group mastered the abstract vocabulary better, and could creatively apply the words. Moreover, incidental learning guaranteed the motivation for learning, and had a better delayed learning effect.

关 键 词：词汇学习 刻意学习 伴随性学习 

分 类 号：H195.3[语言文字—汉语]