高考物理命题的一致性研究及其对物理教育的启示  

The Research on the Consistency of Physics Proposition in College Entrance Examination and Its Implication

作　　者：罗莹[1] 郭晨跃[1] 李勇[2] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学物理系,北京100875 [2]教育部考试中心,北京100080

出　　处：《课程．教材．教法》2012年第11期105-111,共7页Curriculum，Teaching Material and Method

基　　金：全国教育考试“十一五”科研规划重点课题“物理高考题库需求及物理高考试题评价体系研究”的支持

摘　　要：基于SOLO分类理论，采用SEC分析，从知识种类、知识深度、知识广度以及知识样本的平衡性等四个方面对近年来的各省市的高考物理测试进行一致性分析，定量研究了2008年至2011年各省市高考物理试卷之间一致性系数。结果显示：些试卷间具有较好的一致性。各省市高考物理试卷在知识种类方面主要考查了力学、电学知识，在知识深度方面主要考查处于多元和单一结构的认知水平，而保持了它们之间的一致性；知识广度和知识样本的平衡度是影响试卷间一致性的重要因素。这些研究结果对我国物理教育测量与评价有重要的启示。In this paper, based on the SOLO taxonomy theory, the consistency of physics proposition in college entrance examination is researched by the SEC analysis from the categorical concurrence, the depth of knowledge consistency, the range of knowledge correspondence, the balance of representation. The Porter of alignment coefficients are obtained between the provincial and municipal physics papers from 2008 to 2011. The physical propositions mainly test the mechanical and electrical knowledge in the categorical concurrence, and uni-structural and multi-structural level in the depth of knowledge consistency. They are the source of the consistencies between the physic test papers. The influences of the range of knowledge correspondence and the balance of representation are important on the consistencies. These research results are an important implications to our country physical education measurement and evaluation.

关 键 词：一致性 SOLO分类理论 SEC方法 

分 类 号：G633.7[文化科学—教育学]