检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室,北京100101 [2]中国科学院研究生院,北京100049
出 处:《心理科学进展》2012年第11期1889-1898,共10页Advances in Psychological Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(70802059)
摘 要:"团队作为信息加工者的观点"认为,团队执行复杂任务需要经过一系列认知决策,哪些信息被共享,以及信息共享和整合的质量,共同决定团队效能的高低。动机性信息加工理论则进一步提出,认知动机和社会动机共同决定了哪些信息被共享,以及信息共享和整合的质量。认知动机决定信息加工的深度,社会动机决定信息加工的方向,两种动机共同决定决策质量。这一理论可以很好地整合谈判和创造力领域的研究结果,并在团队效能领域得到很好的应用。动机性信息加工理论是对双过程模型和"团队作为信息加工者观点"的发展和整合,并为决策质量的影响因素提供新的分类框架和研究思路。Based on "groups as information processor perspective", motivated information processing (MIP) model emphasizes that information processing and sharing depends on two types of motivations, epistemic motivation and social motivation, respectively. Epistemic motivation refers to the willingness to expend effort to achieve a thorough, rich, and accurate understanding of the world. It determines the depth of information processing. Social motivation is defined as the individual preference for outcome distributions between oneself and others. It influences which information will be processed. Epistemic motivation and social motivation, alone and in combination, interpret information processing at both individual and team level, and information sharing at team level. MIP model contributes to the industrial/organizational psychology literature by integrating the dual-process theory and groups as information processor perspective and by providing a new perspective in the fields of negotiation, creativity, and team effectiveness. Limitations and implications for future study of MIP model are discussed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.116