教育史观:批判与重构  

View of Educational History:Criticizing and Reconstructing

作　　者：张斌贤[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学教育历史与文化研究院,北京100875

出　　处：《教育学报》2012年第6期3-14,共12页Journal of Educational Studies

基　　金："中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助"项目<美国高等教育史>的阶段成果

摘　　要：以米定斯基和康斯坦丁诺夫为代表的旧教育史观具有简化论、依附论、斗争论、规律论、线性论、工具论等特征,其核心是以简化历史唯物主义基本原理为基础,以对历史唯物主义基本概念的教条化为手段,以教育史研究目的的工具化为结果。这种教育史观的消极影响是阻碍我国教育史学科发展的根本原因。批判旧教育史观的目的在于正本清源,科学确立教育史学科重建的出发点。The old view of educational history represented by Medynskiyi and Konstantinov is charac terized by simplism, dependency, conflict, law, lineation and instrumentalism. The core of the old view of educational history is to make educational research purpose instrumental through dogmatizing the basic concepts of historical materialism on the basis of simplifying its basic principles. The negative impact of this view of educational history is the main cause that hinders the development of our educational history discipline. The purpose of criticizing the old view of educational history is to establish the starting point of the reconstruction of the educational history discipline.

关 键 词：教育史观 苏联教育史 编撰模式 教育史研究 

分 类 号：G519[文化科学—教育学]