代际气候正义的陷阱  

Ethical Trap of Intergenerational Climate Justice

作　　者：史军[1] 卢愿清[1] 郝晓雅[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京信息工程大学,南京210044

出　　处：《阅江学刊》2013年第3期16-20,共5页Yuejiang Academic Journal

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金资助项目"中国参与国际气候合作的价值立场与政策选择"(2012M520542);江苏省教育厅人文社科重点研究基地气候变化与公共政策研究院开放项目"国际气候合作的伦理基础--气候正义的理论基础与实现机制研究"(12QHB006)

摘　　要：从气候伦理上看,代内正义是解决代际正义的前提。在应对气候变化的研究和谈判中,不断强调代际气候正义,实际上是要求所有当代人抛开历史责任共同减少排放。这隐藏着发达国家的一个"阴谋":放弃自己的历史责任。无论是代际还是代内,分配正义的核心价值都要求对弱势群体给予特殊关照。气候变化产生的利益与损失存在着不平等分配。气候变化的受益者是否有义务向受害者提供补偿或援助,已经成为一个迫切的伦理道德问题。Intergenerational climate justice precede to intra-generational climate justice from logical aspect, i.e. distribute all the emission space on some principle to different generations on the first step, then redistribute the spaces in each generation. However, from ethical aspect, intra-generational justice should have priority to intergenerational climate justice. If current generation could not come to an agreement on historical and current distribution, how could we anticipate they have the ability and ambition to care the interest of the distant future generation？ Developed countries attempt to escape their historical responsibility by laying up the intra-generational climate justice between contemporary people, and give much discussion on the responsibility that current generation owe to the future generation.

关 键 词：气候变化 气候伦理 代际正义 代内正义 历史责任 

分 类 号：B82-05[哲学宗教—伦理学] X2[环境科学与工程—环境科学]