检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯娟[1] 任小林[2] 田建文[1,3] 樊丽[2] 王晓飞[2]
机构地区:[1]宁夏大学农学院食品科学与工程,宁夏银川750021 [2]西北农林科技大学园艺学院,陕西杨陵712100 [3]宁夏科学技术厅,宁夏银川750001
出 处:《食品工业科技》2013年第14期108-112,共5页Science and Technology of Food Industry
基 金:国家现代苹果产业技术体系专项(NYCYTX-08-05-02)
摘 要:为了直观地比较出洛川、安塞、铜川等10个不同产地富士苹果品质的差异,对富士苹果外在、内在、加工品质三方面进行测定,采用主成分分析和聚类分析法,对其单果重、果皮色泽、可溶性固形物、酸度和硬度等12个主要果实品质指标进行了分析。结果表明,在果实品质评价的12个主成分中,提取出的4个主成分的累积贡献率达到85.439%,可以反映品质的大部分信息,简化后的品质评价指标为单果重、果形指数、可溶性固形物、酸和出汁率。各产地富士苹果综合品质高低的顺序为:阿克苏>静宁>三门峡>烟台>延安>安塞>天水>洛川>铜川>扶风。By the principal component analysis and cluster analysis, 12 main fruit quality index of Fuji apple were determined ,generally including external, internal and processing quality,detailed including the weight of single fruit,skin color and luster,soluble solid content,acidity and hardness etc,the purpose was to be more intuitive compare the difference of Fuji apple's quality with 10 different regions,including Luochuan,Ansai and Tongchuang etc. The results showed that the quality of the simplified evaluation index were weight of single fruit,fruit shape index,soluble solid content,acid and juice yield. Extracting five main components from 12 principal fruit quality evaluation, it could reflect the most of the information about quality and its contribution rate reached 85.439% .It got an order from high to low about Fuji apple's comprehensive quality with different regions, Akesu〉J ingning〉Sanmenxia〉Yantai〉Yan ' an〉Ansai〉Tianshui〉Luochuan〉Tongchuan〉Fufeng.
分 类 号:TS201.1[轻工技术与工程—食品科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229