检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京信息科技大学经济管理学院,北京100192
出 处:《北京信息科技大学学报(自然科学版)》2013年第4期83-87,共5页Journal of Beijing Information Science and Technology University
基 金:北京市哲学社会科学规划基金项目(11JGB057)
摘 要:选取101组上证综合指数等数据,用历史模拟法、方差—协方差法和蒙特卡罗模拟法,对风险价值(VaR,value at risk)进行估算。用3种方法估算出的VaR值表明:在样本数据服从正态分布的条件下,3种计算方法均能得出可靠的风险值,且运用风险值所做的预测可以较好地拟合实际值,3种计算方法得出的VaR值差距可以忽略不计。尽管不同方法各有特点,但无论运用哪种风险值计算方法,对于我国金融机构和投资者以及金融监管部门来说,都有利于我国金融市场风险的管理和控制。Based on the three basic methods including Historical Simulation Method, Variance- covariance Method and Monte Carlo Simulation Method, Shanghai composite index is selected to calculate the "value at risk (VaR)". The comparison of the results under the three methods shows that under the condition of the sample data obey normal distribution, reliable results can be achieved and the forecast matching degree between the calculated VaR and actual values is high. In addition, the difference of the results can be neglected. Although different methods have their characteristics, suitable VaR calculation method should be used by risks management ,financial institutions ,investors and financial regulators.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33