检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国现代应用药学》2013年第8期850-856,共7页Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy
基 金:新疆大学博士启动基金项目(BS080114)
摘 要:目的比较新疆紫草不同极性部位提取物的抗氧化活性。方法采用超临界CO2萃取得到超临界提取物后,萃余物依次用95%乙醇和60%的乙醇提取,对得到的乙醇提取物分别采用不同极性的溶剂分步萃取得到紫草不同极性部位的8个提取物,对上述9个提取物的清除羟基自由基、清除DPPH自由基、总抗氧化活性、抑制脂质过氧化能力等进行了评价。结果超临界CO2萃取物的总抗氧化活性在所有试样中居中,在1 mg·mL 1的浓度下,其清除羟基自由基和DPPH自由基的活性接近或略低于对照品芦丁和BHT,而中等极性部分的乙酸乙酯提取物的抗氧化活性最强,高于同等浓度的对照品BHA和芦丁,但极性较大的部位试样的抗氧化活性总体上相对较弱。结论紫草提取物的各极性部位均具有不同程度的抗氧化能力。OBJECTIVE To compare the different polarity extractions' antioxidant activity from Arnebia euchroma (Royle) Johnst. METHODS The sample was extracted by using supercritical CO2 extract, and then the residue was eluted followed by 95% ethanol and 60% ethanol, which was concentrated and fractional solvent extracted by different polarity solvents to obtain eight extracts derived from Arnebia euchroma (Royle) Johnst. Antioxidant activities of 9 samples above-mentioned were evaluated using four complementary in assays: the inhibition of protection of β-carotene-linoleic acid model system, hydroxyl radicals scavenging, DPPH radicals scavenging, ferric thiocyanated method (FTC), and thiobarbituric acid(TBA) method. RESULTS The total antioxidant activities of supercritical CO2 extract was placed in the middle in all samples. At 1 mg·mL-1, antioxidant activity of acetic ether extracts was strong in some of experiment systems and other polar components were weak compared with a comparison (BHA or rutin), and CO2 extract was nearly BHT or rutin for hydroxyl radicals scavenging andDPPH radicals scavenging. CONCLUSION All the different polar fraction from extract showed varying degrees of antioxidant activities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28