对现行四个高中历史教材版本图片有效性的探讨——基于必修一第一单元(专题一)的对比  

A Study on the Validity of Illustrations in the Four Present Editions of History Textbooks of Senior High School——Based on the comparison of Topic 1,Unit 1 ( Compulsory I )

作　　者：朱思泓[1] 陈泽芳[2] 

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学,广东广州510631 [2]汕头职业技术学院,广东汕头515078

出　　处：《南方职业教育学刊》2013年第2期98-104,共7页Journal of Southern Vocational Education

摘　　要：现行四个高中历史教材版本编排不同,插入的图片各具特色,但存在不少瑕疵,一部分图片有效性难以体现,存在不科学、直观性不强、难以给学生美的启发等诸多问题。通过对比,可以得出图片编排较好的版本范例,以供其他版本编排时有所借鉴。另外通过提供新的图片和有效图片的编排原则,以期充分发挥教材的有效性。With different compilation, each of the present four editions of history textbooks of senior high school has u- nique illustrations. However, they are not flawless. Some illustrations among them are not valid, lacking either scientific preciseness or intuition and being hard to inspire students＇ aesthetic sense. By comparison, conclusions can be made that editions with well compiled exemplifications of illustrations can be adopted by other editions, and by providing new illustrations under the principle of providing valid illustrations, the validity of textbooks would be fully shown.

关 键 词：版本 教材图片 有效性 

分 类 号：G633.51[文化科学—教育学]