检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王娟娟[1]
机构地区:[1]南京工业大学外国语学院,江苏南京211816
出 处:《南京工程学院学报(社会科学版)》2013年第3期34-38,共5页Journal of Nanjing Institute of Technology:Social Science Edition
摘 要:通过分析60名英语学习者的一些数据可比较词汇知识广度和深度对二语阅读理解的贡献力。多元回归分析表明,词汇知识广度和深度对二语阅读理解有较强的同等预测力。在词汇知识广度层面,接受性和产出性词汇量对二语阅读理解的贡献力几乎相同,但是在词汇知识深度层面,聚合知识的贡献力则明显大于一词多义知识。二语教学中对词汇知识的各个成分均应给予重视,尤其要重视一词多义知识等二语学习者掌握薄弱的成分。This paper compares the contributions of breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge to L2 reading comprehension by analyzing the data from 60 English learners. As a multiple regression analysis indicates, both the breadth and depth of vo cabulary knowledge make equally strong contributions to L2 reading comprehension. Within the breadth of vocabulary knowl- edge, receptive and productive vocabulary sizes make similar contributions to 1.2 reading comprehension, white within the depth of vocabulary knowledge, paradigmatic knowledge contributes much more than polysemous knowledge. Therefore, L2 teaching should give weight to each component of vocabulary knowledge, even more weight to components like polysemous knowledge that L2 learners fail to acquire well.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.244.250