检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张景焕[1] 满达呼[1] 刘桂荣[2] 张舜[1] 窦菲菲 林崇德[4]
机构地区:[1]山东师范大学心理学院,济南250014 [2]齐鲁师范学院教师教育学院,济南250013 [3]烟台海阳育才小学,海阳265100 [4]北京师范大学发展心理研究所,北京100875
出 处:《心理发展与教育》2013年第6期595-603,共9页Psychological Development and Education
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金(12YJA190024);教育部哲学社会科学重大攻关项目(11JZD040);山东省科技发展计划项目(2012GGB01189)
摘 要:采用整群抽样法选取548名小学高年级学生为被试,考察父母自主支持、心理控制与社会创造力间的关系以及自尊在其中的中介作用。结果发现:(1)女生社会创造力水平明显高于男生,农村学生社会创造力适宜性水平高于城市学生。(2)典型相关分析发现,在父母教养方式和社会创造力的关系上,交换意见、收回爱能够解释适宜性,自主选择能够解释独创性;(3)父母自主支持正向预测子女的社会创造力(γ=0.27),心理控制则负向预测子女的社会创造力(γ=-0.29);自主支持通过自尊的完全中介作用影响社会创造力(中介效应值为0.12),心理控制则通过自尊的部分中介作用影响社会创造力(中介效应值为0.05),模型的总解释率R2=0.27。Based on a sample of 548 elementary students, the present study explored the characteristics of children' s social creativity, and detected the effects of parenting styles on children's social creativity as well as the mediating role of self-esteem. The result showed that: (1) Significant differences of social creativity were emerged in gender and urban-rural. Girls performed significantly higher social creativity than boys. Students from the rural areas reported significantly higher suitability than those from the urban areas. (2) Canonical correlation suggested that on the relationship between parenting styles and social creativity, opinions exchange and love withdrawal could explain the appropriateness, while choice making could explain the originality. (3) Parental autonomy support was a significant positive predicator of social creativity (γ = 0.27), while psychological control was a significant negative predicator of social creativity (γ = -0.29). Self-esteem partly mediated the relationship between parental autonomy support/ psychological control and social creativity.
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30