德里达解构思维方式批判  

A Critique of Derrida's Deconstructive Mode of Thinking

作　　者：李兵[1] 

机构地区：[1]曲靖师范学院人文学院

出　　处：《文艺理论研究》2013年第6期178-184,共7页Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(11CZW009);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(10YJC751041);云南省哲学社会科学创新团队"云南民族文化与文艺理论研究"建设项目阶段性成果

摘　　要："解构"作为一种思维方式在20世纪后期影响甚大,但对之也存在诸多误解。德里达对二元对立的思维方式的突破并非是非理性的破坏,而是做了严密的逻辑分析,其异质性思维中包含了两个重要的视角:时间和他者。德里达的跨界书写暗合了后现代的去分化的思维,使艺术边界问题的讨论更加复杂。其思维的主要局限在于还原论思维,语言被还原为超级主体,作者的权威得以重新返魅。语言的自反性使用导致德里达的文本处于自我解构的困境,被众多批评家诟病为双重逻辑,其思维方式中的前逻辑却一再被遮蔽。Despite of misunderstanding, deconstruction as a kind of way of thinking has inserted profound influence in the late 20th century. Derrida＇ s undermining of the dualistic way of thinking may not be taken as an irrational destruction, but as a rigorously logical analysis. The heterogeneous way of thinking contains two important perspectives of time and otherness. Derrida＇ s cross - disciplinary writing implicates a post - modern thought of dedifferentiation, which further complicates the boundaries between arts. However, the main limitation of Derrida＇ s mode of thinking lies in its reduetionist way of thought, in which language is reduced to super subject and the author＇ s authority is re - enchanted. The reflective use of language leads to the self - deconstruction of Derrida＇ s writing, which entails a double logic, while the pre - logic underlying the double logic has all the time been concealed.

关 键 词：思维方式 双重逻辑 局限 

分 类 号：I01[文学—文学理论]