检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《教育发展研究》2014年第3期30-35,共6页Research in Educational Development
基 金:国家社科基金教育学国家青年课题"利益相关者视角下的我国大学学生评教研究(CIA120141)"的部分成果
摘 要:我国大学生评教制度遭到教师和学生诟病的主要原因在于学生评教指标体系设计不合理。本文采用修订后的美国SIRⅡ量表进行问卷调查,发现影响学生评教结果的首要因素是学生的课程收获,第二项重要因素是学生的努力与投入。这一结论迥异于当前我国大学普遍实施的指标体系中对教师教学表现和教学行为的考量,却耦合了学生评价教师教学的内在逻辑。我国大学学生评教指标体系的设计应以学生的课程收获、学生的努力和投入为依据与标准。The reason of the undergraduate evaluation of teaching effectiveness criticized by the faculty and students are the irrational design of our index systems. The revised version of SIR II was used to investigate the index of the impact on the result of the undergraduate evaluation of teaching effectiveness. The results show that the course outcomes significantly affect the result of the undergraduate evaluation of teaching effectiveness, and student effort and involvement is the second impact index. The result is contrary to the teaching administrator-oriented model, but consistent with the inner logic of the undergraduate evaluation of teaching effectiveness. The index design of the undergraduate evaluation of teaching effectiveness must be based on promoting student course outcomes and student effort and involvement.
分 类 号:G645.5[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28