“存心养性”与“道法自然”——从儒道“天道”、“心性”上的差异看中国哲学“天人合一”的两种模式  

Confucian Nurture with Morality" and "Taoist Approach to Nature

作　　者：张轩[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学院,北京100872

出　　处：《临沧师范高等专科学校学报》2014年第1期122-125,132,共5页Journal of Lincang Education College

摘　　要："天人合一"是中国传统思想的核心理念。当今很多媒体热衷于阐述其中的生态和谐观,却也导致了人们对其完整内涵的忽视。其实,"天人合一"在道家与儒家那里有着极为不同的内涵:儒学以"天人合德"为终极指向,注重天与人之间的道德感呼应;道家以"见素抱朴"为最高依归,相应地集中于挖掘天与人自然自在的"相类性"。可见,人伦的道德维度与人本身的自由追求是古代"天人合一"的两大重要部分,二者对于我们解决当今社会语境下人的道德滑坡和人格异化有着很大的启发意义,值得深入挖掘。Harmony between nature and man is the core of the traditional thought. Media are enthusiastic about the ecological view of the world harmony, but few people learn the full connota- tion. “Harmony between nature and man” means differently for Taoism and Confucianism. Confu- cianism aims at “moral concord between nature and man” while the other focuses on “similarity be- tween nature and man”. Therefore, man＇s morality dimension and his pursuit of freedom used to be two major elements, which will be instructive for people nowadays whose morality is deteriorating and personality is dissimilating, and thus it is quite worthwhile to conduct an in-depth exploration.

关 键 词：天人合一 存心养性 道法自然 儒道对比 

分 类 号：B223.1[哲学宗教—中国哲学]