社会启动下不同思维方式对双任务成绩的影响  

Influence of Different Modes of Thinking on the Performance of a Dual Task

作　　者：何光辉[1] 陆爱桃[1] 张美超[1] 李文桃 

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学,广州510631

出　　处：《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》2014年第1期43-48,共6页Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）

基　　金：国家自然科学基金"聋人汉语;手语中的语音编码研究"(31200762)资助;教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"中国聋人手语的加工:来自认知神经科学的证据"(11YJC740071)资助;国家基础科学人才培养基金"华南师范大学心理学基地人才培养支撑条件建设项目"(J1030729和J1210024)资助

摘　　要：通过控制SOA形成两种任务相继呈现的不同情境,考察社会启动范式下不同思维方式对双任务成绩的影响。发现:在任务1上,发散思维启动条件下反应兼容效应大于聚合思维启动条件,且两者均大于无思维启动条件。说明:被试的聚合思维和发散思维被成功启动,激活了不同的思维认知通道,从而影响了随后的任务1的成绩;在任务2上,发散思维启动条件和聚合思维启动条件均出现心理不应期效应,且发散思维比聚合思维的效应小。这些结果支持了社会启动下思维认知的双通道模型。The present study primarily investigated whether different modes of thinking could influence the performance of a dual task in a social priming paradigm by controlling the SOA between Task 1 and Task 2. The analysis of response time in Task 1 shows a larger compatibility effect of divergent thinking than that of convergent thinking condition with both of them larger than the neutral condition. It suggests that the different modes of thinking have been successfully primed, thus activate different cognitive control status, and have an impact on the performance of subsequent Task 1. The analysis of response time in Task 2 shows that the PRP effect occurs in both divergent-thinking priming condition and convergent-thinking priming condition with a more salient effect in convergent-thinking priming condition. Our results provide evidence to support the dual-pathway model of creativity.

关 键 词：双任务 聚合思维 发散思维 SOA 

分 类 号：B842.3[哲学宗教—基础心理学]