亚里士多德与儒家的中道观比较  

Acomparative study of Aristotle's moderation and Confucian Mean

作　　者：陈科华[1] 刘桂华[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学政治系,广西桂林541001

出　　处：《云南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2001年第5期60-64,共5页Journal of Yunnan Normal University：Humanities and Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：亚里士多德的中道观和儒家的中庸之道虽都以德性作为自己的哲学基础 ,但因二者对德性的理解不同 ,即亚氏之德性是一种理性 ,而儒家之德性是一种仁性 ,故前者之中道观重在对外在的客观中道的理性把握上 ,而后者之中道论则重在对内在的主观之“中”(即“未发之中”)的觉解上 ;前者之“相对中道”论意在为主体提倡一种可操作的伦理实践标准 ,而后者之“时中”论则意在主体之道德自由的挺立。Both Aristutle's theory of moderation and the Confucian doctrine of the mean are based on their own virtues, however Aristotle's virtues are rational and the Confucianists are benevolent because of their different comprehesion of the virtues. Aristotle stressed the rational mastery of the external objective moderation while the Confucianists emphasized the understanding of the internal subjective mean, the former's theory means to advocate a practical standard for the object whereas the later's doctrine refers to the futher freedom of morality.

关 键 词：中道观 比较研究 亚里士多德 儒家 德性 仁性 相对中道 时中 极端 次中 

分 类 号：B222[哲学宗教—中国哲学] B502.233