检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:申素平 陈梓健 SHEN Suping;CHEN Zijian
出 处:《北京大学教育评论》2018年第2期151-163,191-191,共14页Peking University Education Review
摘 要:我国宪法和教育法规定公民有受教育的权利和义务,学界对此提出权利义务复合观、权利观、义务观三种解释观点,本文通过分析新中国宪法及义务教育法相关法条的产生、发展及演变历程,认为对义务教育阶段公民受教育权的理解应持权利义务复合观,而将受教育的权利理解为起点式及过程性的权利、受教育的义务理解为结果式及目标性的义务。According to the laws of the People'sRepublic of China (PRC), citizens have the right as well as the obligation to receive education. However, with regard to this issue, academia has raised three theories, the theory of duties, the theory of a composite of rights and duties and the theory of rights. Based on related historical materials, this paper summarizes and analyzes the establishment, development and evolution of related clauses in the Constitution and the Compulsory Education Law of the PRC. In light of China's legislative history, we should continue holding the theory of a composite of rights and duties. But the author believes that interpretation of the right here should be focused on the starting point and the process, while that of the obligation should be focused on the result and the goal.
分 类 号:G40-011.8[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33