检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:侠牧 钟海青[1] 李雪榴 XIA Mu;ZHONG Hai-qing;LI Xue-liu(School of Education Science,Guangxi University for Nationalities,Guangxi,Nanning 530006;School of Physical Education,Guangxi Teachers Education University,Guangxi,Nanning 530006)
机构地区:[1]广西民族大学教育科学学院,广西南宁530006 [2]广西师范学院体育学院,广西南宁530006
出 处:《民族教育研究》2018年第6期119-126,共8页Journal of Research on Education for Ethnic Minorities
基 金:广西教育科学"十二五"规划2015年度广西教育科学重点研究基地重大课题"广西壮族聚集地小学生学业成绩生态系统研究"(项目编号:2015JD209)的阶段性成果
摘 要:研究以布朗分布伦纳的Person(个人)-Process(过程)-Context(环境)-Time(时间)模型(PPCT模型)为理论基础,以教师期望问卷、自编的教师积极与消极反馈频次问卷和学业自我效能感量表为测量工具,以广西壮族聚居地427名小学生为研究样本,探索教师期望、教师的积极或消极反馈对广西壮族聚居地小学生学业自我效能的协同影响。结果表明:(1)教师期望、教师的积极或消极反馈与学生的学业自我效能之间存在显著的相关关系;(2)在教师对学生实施的众多积极或消极反馈中,表扬与心理惩罚的频次在教师期望与学生学业自我效能之间起部分中介作用。Based on PPCT model(Person, Process, Context and Time) of Bronfenbrenner, using questionnaire of teacher’s expectation, self-designed questionnaire of the frequency of teacher’s positive and negative feedbacks and academic self-efficacy scale, and taking 427 pupils in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region as samples, a study was made of the effect of teacher’s expectation and their positive and negative feedbacks on pupils’ academic self-efficacy. The results show that 1) there is a significant correlation between teacher’s expectation and their positive and negative feedbacks and pupils’ academic self-efficacy;and 2) in teacher’s positive and negative feedbacks, the frequency of praise and psychological punishment plays a mediating role between teacher’s expectation and pupils’ academic self-efficacy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28