检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨光辉[1] 陈光敏 YANG Guanghui;CHEN Guangmin(Jilin Provincial Institute of Education,Changchun Jilin 130022,China;Experimental High School of Fengman District of Jilin City,Jilin Jilin 132013,China)
机构地区:[1]吉林省教育学院,吉林长春130022 [2]吉林省吉林市丰满区实验中学,吉林吉林132013
出 处:《吉林省教育学院学报》2019年第2期1-5,共5页Journal of Jilin Provincial Institute of Education
基 金:吉林省教育科学"十三五"规划课题;课题批准号:GH171078
摘 要:基于课堂观察的视角对9名青年教师的9节新授课进行了问题有效性研究。研究主要从提问的清晰度、问题的层次、教师理答方式、学生回答的情况等维度进行了统计分析,结果表明:90%的教师都能清晰地表达想要提出的问题;在全部问题中,低思维水平的问题占83%,高思维水平的问题仅占17%,说明青年教师在提问问题的层次上还有待进一步提高;在理答方面,教师追问的占40%,学生回答问题时,教师基本上都能以鼓励为主,没有批评讽刺的情况;从学生回答问题的情况来看,集体回答和个别回答的问题共占98.0%,交流讨论后回答问题的情况几乎为零,说明教师合作交流自主学习的教学方法做得还不够好。Based on classroom observation, the effectiveness of nine new lessons taught by nine young teachers was studied.The results show that 90% of the teachers can clearly express the questions they want to ask, 83% of the questions with low thinking level and only 17% of the questions with high thinking level, indicating that young teachers still need to improve on the level of questions. Furthermore, 40% of teachers set up questions after students finishing their answering and teachers could encourage students to answer questions without criticism and irony. According to students’ answering to the questions, 98.0% are collective and individual answers, and almost no questions are answered after exchange and discussion, indicating that teachers’ teaching methods of cooperative communication and autonomous learning are not good enough.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185