检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨毅青[1] 王綪 金钥 张文禹[3] 梁丽雅[3,4] 闫师杰[3,4] 马俪珍[3,4,5]
机构地区:[1]天津农学院水产学院,天津300384 [2]天津农学院动物科学与动物医学学院,天津300384 [3]天津农学院食品科学与生物工程学院,天津300384 [4]天津市农副产品深加工技术工程中心,天津300384 [5]天津市鱼糜高值转化及品质控制技术企业重点实验室,天津300304
出 处:《食品与机械》2014年第4期155-160,共6页Food and Machinery
基 金:国家级星火计划项目(编号:2013GA610002);天津市科技支撑计划项目(编号:13ZCZDNC01600)
摘 要:分别研究水漂、盐漂和碱漂3种漂洗工艺对鲢鱼肉中品质指标及氯霉素残留的影响。结果表明:经漂洗,鲢鱼肉的蛋白质、脂肪和灰分含量均降低,水分含量升高,其中盐漂1∶5的蛋白质和灰分损失最少;盐漂L*值显著高于水漂与碱漂,a*值和b*值变化不显著(P>0.05);碱漂对pH值影响最大,水漂最小;漂洗后TBARS值显著降低;盐漂1∶5可达到最佳保水性;水漂和盐漂可显著降低鲢鱼肉中氯霉素残留,但碱漂欠佳。因此,盐漂1∶5是最佳漂洗工艺,它不仅可以保持良好的品质,而且有效降低鱼肉中的氯霉素残留。The effects of rinse process (water rinsing, saline rinsing and alkaline rinsing) on quality index and chloramphenicol residues in chub were analyzed. The results showed, after rinsing, crude protein, crude fat and ash of chub showed a downward trend, but water content increased, with crude protein and ash of saline rinsing 1 : 5 loss minimum among them. L * of saline rinsing was significantly higher than water rinsing and alkaline rinsing; values of a * and b * were no significant difference(P〉0.05). Effects on pH values was the largest of alkaline rinsing, but water rinsing was minimal. The values of TBARS were decreased significantly. Saline rinsing 1 z 5 achieved the best water retention. The residues of chloramphenicol in chub decreased higher by water and saline rinsing, alkaline rinsing was poor. So saline rinsing 1 : 5 was the best rinse process that chloramphenicol residues of fishes greatly reduced while maintaining a good quality.
分 类 号:TS254.4[轻工技术与工程—水产品加工及贮藏工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222