检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学牵引动力国家重点实验室,四川成都610031 [2]西南交通大学机械工程学院,四川成都610031
出 处:《铁道学报》2014年第8期12-18,共7页Journal of the China Railway Society
基 金:国家自然科学基金(51005190)
摘 要:通过对30t轴重铁路货车的仿真,对比分析车轮采用LM磨耗型踏面与75kg/m、60kg/m两种钢轨匹配后各磨耗评定指标,得出LM型踏面与75kg/m重型钢轨匹配时存在一定不适应的结论。为了满足我国大轴重铁路货车技术的发展需求,从减少轮轨磨耗考虑,设计出两种与75kg/m重型钢轨匹配性能更优的车轮踏面。基于FASTSIM算法和Archard磨耗模型,对30t轴重货车车轮磨耗进行仿真计算,并对比分析优化前后车轮踏面磨耗状态及相关指标。研究结果表明:两种优化型踏面与75kg/m钢轨匹配下的车轮磨耗程度均比LM型踏面车轮磨耗要小,而且随着运行里程的增加,这种趋势更加明显。Through simulation of freight cars each with the 30 t axle load ,comparative analysis on wear indexes was made by the dynamic model corresponding to respective matching between the LM type worn wheel tread with 75 kg/m rails and with 60 kg/m rails . Certain inadaptability was shown in matching between the LM wheel tread and 75 kg/m heavy rails .In order to meet the needs of developing large axle load railway wagons in China ,two types of wheel treads with better performance of wheel-rail wear in matching with 75 kg/m rails were designed . The wheel wear of the 30 t axle load wagon was simulated and calculated with the FASTSIM algorithm and Archard wear model ,and the wear status and relevant indexes of wheel treads before and after wheel tread optimization were compared . The research results indicate as follows :In matching with 75 kg/m heavy rails , the two types of optimized wheel treads undergo wear of a lesser degree as compared with the LM type wheel tread;this trend becomes more and more significant with increasing of the running mileage .
关 键 词:30 t轴重 铁路货车 踏面优化 轮轨磨耗 FASTSIM 算法
分 类 号:U270.331.1[机械工程—车辆工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222