检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽工业大学商学院,安徽马鞍山243032 [2]浙江大学管理学院,浙江杭州310058
出 处:《中国管理科学》2014年第10期142-148,共7页Chinese Journal of Management Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71172115);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71472003);中国工程院资助项目(2014-XY-40)
摘 要:关于知识与创新间的关系,现有研究多强调不同类型知识对创新总体绩效的影响差异,较少关注同一知识基对创新微观过程的不同阶段是否具有同等影响。针对这一理论缺口,本研究首先建构了知识积累与基于创新微观过程的企业创新能力间关系模型,并利用问卷调查获得的419份国内企业数据、利用层次回归方法进行实证检验。研究发现:企业知识积累对创新能力具有显著提升作用,并且这种积极效应贯穿在创新的整个微观过程中;分别以内、外组织学习为特征的不同知识激活机制在促进知识贡献于创新不同阶段能力提升过程中具有不同影响。本文最后讨论了理论贡献、管理意义及局限。The relationship between knowledge and innovation always gains highly concerning. However, existing literature has paid more attention to the relationship between different knowledge and innovation performance than that between same knowledge and different sub-capability of innovation capabilities, which may be constructed according to micro-processes of a firm's innovation. This theoretical gap provides an opportunity for the present paper. A theoretical model is proposed and tested by hierarchical regression analysis, using data collected from 419 domestic firms. Results Show that knowledge accumulation is positive with innovation capabilities throughout all sub-processes of innovating. Different mechanisms of knowledge reactivation have different impacts on the relationship between knowledge accumulation and innovation capabilities. Finally, theoretical contribution, managerial implications and limitations are discussed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28