检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程红艳[1]
机构地区:[1]华中师范大学教育学院
出 处:《南京社会科学》2014年第11期116-123,共8页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences
基 金:国家社科基金青年项目"中部地区社会分层与城乡义务教育均衡发展研究"(CFA100130)的阶段性成果
摘 要:教育公平包含权利平等与机会均等两个基本理念,但两者之间可能存在冲突,前者体现民主主义的诉求,后者则为精英主义的诉求。衡量基础教育质量高下,需要教育公平的视角。教育公平与质量的交集在于两者目标一致,一是提高全民教育质量,二是建构以学习者为中心的教育体系;两者冲突之处在于:一是教育经费的投入是遵守权利优先还是效率优先原则,二是谁的学习需求优先得到满足?代表性的观点认为应通过提高教育质量实现教育公平,但这种做法存在着很多误区,本文认为更好的办法是教育公平先行,通过促进教育公平来提高基础教育质量。Education equality is composed of two fundamental ideas,naming equal rights to education and equal opportunity for all. Nevertheless,these two parts might conflict with each other,since equal rights to education represent a resort to democracy whereas equal opportunity to elitism.The ideal of equality and quality of education overlaps in their goals which are aiming to enhance the quality of education for all and to construct a student-centered education system,while diverging in two issues:( 1) what is the priority of educational investment,ensuring the equality of rights or maximizing the utility;( 2) whose needs of learning shall be first met? A typical opinion in China is that education equality can be realized by improving the quality of education; however,by doing that,education is very likely to be led astray. A better choice is to put equality first above quality,improving education quality by validating education equality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222