检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李丽[1]
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学教育科学学院
出 处:《现代教育论丛》2014年第5期17-24,共8页Modern Education Review
摘 要:伊里奇的《非学校化社会》对学校弊端进行了深刻揭露和批判,并在此基础上构想了"学习网络"以取代学校,进而达到"非学校化社会"的理想。在中国学者对《非学校化社会》的解读中,存在一种普遍批评:伊里奇主张"废除所有类型的学校"是走向极端、非此即彼、因噎废食。事实上,伊里奇并非单纯地主张"非学校化",而是追求社会的"非制度化",想要扭转制度化给社会造成的不幸。Illich’s Deschooling Society made a profound expose and criticize to the disadvantages of the school . Based on which he conceived the conception of the learning network to replace the school system, and then achieved the ideal of “deschooling society” . In the interpretation to Deschooling Society of Chinese scholars, there is a widespread criticism: Illich advocated abolishing all types of school, which went to the extreme, which was black or white, and which gave up eating for fear of choking . In fact, Illich didn’t want to abolish all types of schools simply . What he pursuited was non-institutionalized society, and he wanted to turn the misfortune that the institutionalization caused . Based on this analysis, we can come to new conclu-sion to Deschooling Society .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.147.59.250