检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海对外经贸大学工商管理学院 [2]上海师范大学法政学院
出 处:《管理学报》2015年第2期167-177,共11页Chinese Journal of Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助青年项目(71401100);上海市085工程教委重点学科专项资助项目(JWXK-14012)
摘 要:为建立更整合的SSG构念,基于多维度人际关系理论,提出SSG三维构念,认为上下级关系指在某一时刻存在于上下级之间的基于利益、情感和身份义务的连结。工具性、情感性、义务性是构成上下级关系的3个维度,由此发展出SSG类型构念初始模型。为检验理论,以调查与案例混合法收集并分析39对上下级关系的相关信息,基于分析结果形成SSG类型构念修正模型。经检验,修正后的SSG类型构念与案例有较高的相符程度。最终形成的SSG构念理论包括构念界定、维度内涵、维度的动态发展、维度构念与类型构念的对应关系和类型描述等内容。To clarify the definition of SSG dimensions and examine the initial model of SSG typol- ogy, a mixed design of survey and case study was conducted, in which 39 supervisor-subordinate dy- ads were investigated. The result shows that the behavior variance on each dimension was quite large, and initial model of SSG typology differentiated in most cases, but failed in some cases. Some revision was made based on the results. The revised model of SSG typology includes 7 types of SSG. Investi- gator triangulation was used to test the internal validity of the case study. Kendall consistency coeffi- cient and Kappa test both confirm the high consistency between the revised model and the cases. The final SSG construct theory involves the construct definition, the dimension connotations, the dimen- sion dynamic, the typology model, and the type descriptions. Promising areas for future research were identified in the end.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145