检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:冯建军[1,2]
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学道德教育研究所 [2]南京师范大学教育科学学院
出 处:《教育研究》2015年第1期10-15,51,共7页Educational Research
基 金:国家社科基金(教育学)一般项目"我国教育哲学学科发展的世纪反思与人学建构"(项目编号:BAA120010)的研究成果
摘 要:我国教育哲学学科的发展存在着三大问题:在定性上,教育哲学姓"哲",还是姓"教";在定向上,教育哲学是走哲学化路线,还是走实践化路线;在定位上,教育哲学是西方的教育哲学,还是中国的教育哲学。这些问题是我国教育哲学发展无法绕过的问题,也是影响教育学科发展的根本性问题。我们需要文化自觉与文化自信,将中国传统的和西方的教育哲学资源自觉地融入当代教育哲学的架构,建构属于"中国"的、"当代"的教育哲学。Three problems appeared when scanning on the development of Chinese educational philosophy. The first one is that whether educational philosophy belongs to philosophy or education in its definition. The second one is that educational philosophy should take the philosophical route or practical route in its direction. The third one is that educational philosophy should search for resources home or abroad in its position. These three problems are not only the inevitable issues in the process of educational philosophy development, but also the fundamental problems that affect the development of education. We need cultural consciousness and cultural confidence, taking educational resources on philosophy home and abroad into our contemporary educational philosophy, to establish a kind of educational philosophy which is both Chinese and contemporary.
分 类 号:G40-02[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3