检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程宏宇[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江大学教育学院,杭州310028
出 处:《应用心理学》2014年第3期234-242,262,共10页Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基 金:教育部人文社科研究项目(No.11YJC880012);浙江省钱江人才计划C类项目(No.QJC1202003)课题研究成果
摘 要:本研究通过学生的评价对中美高校教师的教学风格进行测量和比较,并对两个教师群体在教学风格上的差异能否部分地解释中美大学生存在的课堂学习行为差异进行了检验。研究采用相关量表对185名中国大学生和120名美国大学生施测,要求他们对教师的教学风格和自己在课堂上的行为表现进行评价。数据分析结果表明,学生所感知的中美教师在执行型、保守型和整体型风格上存在显著差异;中美大学生在课堂学习行为的课堂活动参与、提出问题、对师生关系的独立性等维度上存在显著差异;学生所感知的教师教学风格的各维度均与学生的课堂行为表现显著相关;教师教学风格中的保守型和整体型能够部分地解释中美学生之间存在的课堂学习行为差异。The purpose of this study was to compare teaching styles of American and Chinese teachers in higher schools, and to examine the hypothesis that the style differences between American and Chinese teachers could at least partially explain the distinct learning behaviors presented by American students and Chinese students in the classroom. 185 Chinese undergraduates and 120 American undergraduates were asked to assess their teachers' teaching style and to rate on their own behavioral performances in the classroom. The results of data analyses indicated that Chinese and American teachers differ significandy in executive style, conservative style and global style ; Chinese students and American students differ significantly in classroom activity partieipation, indication of understanding and independency in teacher-student relationship; multiple teaching styles are significantly related to students'classroom behaviors ; teachers ' conservative style and global style can partially explain the behavioral differences in the classroom between Chinese students and American students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3