2014年高考英语语法填空题命题质量探析  

Investigations on the Gap-filling of 2014 NMET

作　　者：付向东 

机构地区：[1]平煤高级中学,内蒙古赤峰024076

出　　处：《基础教育外语教学研究》2015年第2期27-32,共6页Foreign Language Teaching & Research in Basic Education

摘　　要：本文参照《考试大纲》和李筱菊的考点效度，结合语法填空命题的特点自行设计了研究量表，分析了2014年高考英语语法填空题型的试题设计、考查词汇和考点效度。通过研究发现：试题设计较为合理，篇章长度、空格设置方面较为一致，文本内容真实性较强，但是试题“提示语”有待进一步商榷；考查词汇以动词、名词、形容词为主，多以“提示词”命题，而“非提示词”则多为虚词，且“提示性词”形式变化有一定的规律；考点效度方面比较关注句子层次和词组层次，焦点因素以考查语法和搭配为主，而语篇考查不太明显。此外，笔者建议下一步试题的命制中应该规范“提示语”、调整动词、名词和形容词的个别考点、增加语篇考点；同时也建议教师在复习教学中注重语篇阅读、关注语言现象、精选习题和关注词汇拼写。Based on test syllabus, validity of testing points and features of gap-filling, the paper investigated what the type of exam focused on from the perspectives of test designed, words examined and validity of points. The findings are show that the test is designed in an appropriate way, with uniform in the length of text and blanks filled, and authenticity of the text exist, but ＂guiding words＂ remain to be revised; words examined are mainly for verbs, nouns, and adjectives, which are examined by giving prompting words, while non-prompting words are to be filled with regular function words; the points of sentences and phrases are mostly based on grammar and collocation. Besides, some suggestions that ＂guiding words＂ should be revised, some points like verbs, nouns, and adjectives should be adapted and the points on discourse should be added are given to be discussed on text designing, and other advice are given on teaching for exams, that reading on discourse should he strengthened, language markers should he focused on, excises should be selected and words spelling also should be paid much attention to.

关 键 词：语法填空 试题设计 考查词汇 考点效度 

分 类 号：G726.9[文化科学—成人教育学]