朱熹的“心即理”及其与“性即理”的关系——兼论朱陆之异同  

On the Relation Between Zhu Xi's " Mind is the Ideal" and "Inherent Quality is the Ideal" :Also on the Similarities and Differences Between Zhu and Lu

作　　者：乐爱国[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学哲学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《徐州工程学院学报（社会科学版）》2015年第2期14-18,共5页Journal of Xuzhou Institute of Technology：Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目"朱熹<中庸>学研究"(12FZX005);教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目"百年朱子学研究精华集成"(12JZD007)

摘　　要：朱熹强调"性"与"心"的不同,并较多讲"性即理",但是,朱熹又讲"心即理",并对"心"多有研究,从而表明朱熹讲"性即理"不仅与讲"心即理"可以并行不悖,而且与陆九渊讲"心即理"也属大同小异。因此,朱陆的差异不在于朱熹讲"性即理"、陆九渊讲"心即理",而在于朱熹所谓陆九渊"不知有气禀之杂",从而造成工夫论上的差异。Toward the differentences between people＇s ＂inherent quality＂ and ＂mind＂ ,although Zhu Xi put more emphasis on the former, that is ＂inherent Quality is the Ideal＂ ,he also advocated that ＂Mind is the Ideal＂. It not only illustrated that in his mind these two ideals can coexist simultaneously but are much the same as Lu Jiuyuan＇s parapsychology. Therefore, the differences beween Zhu and I.u didn＇t lie in whether they adovocated the quality or mind of people, but in the controversy of moral cultivation as zhu noted Lu＇s ＂ignorance of people＇s intrinsic flauts of nature＂.

关 键 词：朱熹 心即理 性即理 陆九渊 气禀 

分 类 号：B244.7[哲学宗教—中国哲学]