大陆与台湾地区义务教育数学课程目标的比较研究及其启示  

A Comparative Study of Curriculum Objectives of Mathematics in Compulsory Education Between China's Mainland and Taiwan Region

作　　者：吕世虎[1] 杨健[1] 林碧珍 

机构地区：[1]西北师范大学教育学院,甘肃兰州730070 [2]新竹教育大学数理教育研究所,台湾新竹30014

出　　处：《当代教育与文化》2015年第2期52-57,共6页Contemporary Education and Culture

基　　金：全国教育科学"十二五"规划2011年度教育部重点课题"改革开放以来中国中小学数学课程发展史研究"(GIA117002)阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：运用文献分析法和比较研究法,从数学课程目标的体系和数学课程目标内容两个维度对大陆和台湾地区现行义务教育数学课程目标进行比较研究。结果表明,两岸数学课程体系都是自上而下表述课程目标且表述方式具体、明确,层次性和可操作性强;两岸数学课程都重视学生知识、能力和情感的全面发展;两岸数学课程都追求社会本位、学生本位和知识本位相协调的价值取向。两岸数学课程目标的不同点在于:大陆的课程标准比较重视发挥数学课程的教育性功能,而台湾地区的课程纲要突出强调学生的能力发展;在课程目标的价值取向上,大陆课程标准表述更加关注学生本位,台湾地区课程纲要表述比较倾向知识本位。在未来数学课程改革中,两岸数学课程应该相互借鉴,取长补短。This study adopts the methods of literature analysis and comparative research to compare the curriculum objectives of mathematics in compulsory education in China's Mainland and Taiwan from two dimensions ：the system of curriculum objective and contents of curriculum objectives . The results reveal the similarities as ：1） Both curriculum systems are top‐down , with objectives concretely and accurately described , well feasible to be implemented ; 2 ） Emphasis is laid on students＆#39;overall development , including their know ledge , competence and affection;3 ） T he value pursuit is oriented towards the coordination among society‐based , discipline‐based and learner‐centered curricula . The differences of two the curricula are：1） The Curriculum Standards in China's Mainland attaches more importance to the educational function of curriculum , while the curriculum in Taiwan focuses on the development of students＆#39;competence;2） In terms of the value‐orientation of the curriculum objectives ,The Curriculum Standards in China's Mainland is learner‐centered ,while curriculum of Taiwan is content‐based .In the future ,China's Mainland and Taiwan should learn from each other in mathematics curriculum reform .

关 键 词：大陆 台湾地区 数学课程目标 比较研究 

分 类 号：G423.04[文化科学—课程与教学论] G623.5[文化科学—教育学]