道义公正量表的修订及其应用  

Validation and Application of the Deontic Justice Scale

作　　者：张珊珊[1] 张建新[2,3] 

机构地区：[1]天津职业技术师范大学职教学院,天津300222 [2]中国科学院心理健康重点实验室,北京100101 [3]中国科学院心理研究所,北京100101

出　　处：《人类工效学》2015年第3期6-9,共4页Chinese Journal of Ergonomics

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(70971126;71273255);天津市高校人文社科项目(20142508);教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(13YJC190022)

摘　　要：目的引入Beugr编制的道义公正量表,检验其在中国文化背景中的适用性,同时检验其对惩罚意向的预测作用。方法使用道义公正量表的中文翻译版,经过初测和两次正式施测,检验各项的测量学指标。结果探索性因素分析表明中文版道义公正量表与原量表的三个维度(道德责任、道德愤怒和道德问责)基本保持一致,验证性因素分析表明三因素模型拟合指标良好;量表各维度的内部一致性信度和重测信度较好;情境启动实验表明道义公正与惩罚意向和愤怒情绪之间存在显著相关。结论修订后的中文版道义公正量表信、效度良好,可作为相关研究的工具。Objective To introduce the Deontic Justice Scale developed by Beugr,and to exam its applicability in Chinese cultural background and its predictive effect on punishment intention. Methods The Chinese version of Deontic Justice Scale was used to test the measurement indicators through preliminary survey and two formal tests.Results The Exploratory Factor Analysis confirmed the relatively consistent results between the Chinese version and original version of Deontic Justice Scale,consisting of moral obligation,moral accountability and moral outrage.Meanwhile,the confirmatory factor analysis verified the hypothesized three- factor model had better indices of fit. All of the three subscales showed acceptable internal consistencies and test- retest reliabilities. Meanwhile,deontic justice had a positive correlation with punishment intention and anger. Conclusion The revised Chinese version of Deontic Justice Scale is reliable and valid for application as a research tool in China.

关 键 词：组织公正 道义公正量表 惩罚意向 愤怒情绪 

分 类 号：B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学] C93[哲学宗教—心理学]