检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:廖述务[1]
出 处:《海南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第5期63-66,共4页Journal of Hainan Normal University(Social Sciences)
基 金:海南省哲学社会科学专项课题"文学理论体系与‘美学立场’研究"(编号:HNSK12-10)
摘 要:文学理论教材在文学理论体系建构中扮演关键角色。建国以来,文论教材处理理论资源的方式主要有三种:中西拼凑型、"中学为体,西学为用"型、西方后学型。这三种处理方式都有其合理性,但其缺陷亦十分明显。理论资源往往还成为理论体系价值属性的判断依据。这些均表征了当下文学理论体系建构的深层次危机。文学理论自主性的真正获具是解决此危机的根本路径。Teaching materials on literary theories play a key role in the construction of the literary theory system. Since the founding of New China, there have emerged three approaches to the theoretic resources of textbooks on literary theories--a blend of Chinese and Western literary theories, the use of Western theories with Chinese learning as the basic framework, and the copying of Western theoretic construction--each of which has its overt flaws despite their respective rationality, for theory resources are often apt to become bases for determining the value property of the literary theory system--a representation of the deep crisis in the current construction of the literary theory system. As such, the actual acquisition of autonomy in literary theories is a basic solution to such a crisis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28